Indoor tanning involves using a device that emits ultraviolet radiation to produce a cosmetic sun tanning. Typically found in tanning salons, gyms, spas, hotels, and sporting facilities, and less often in private residences, the most common device is a horizontal tanning bed, also known as a sunbed or solarium. Vertical devices are known as tanning booths or stand-up sunbeds.
First introduced in the 1960s, indoor tanning became popular with people in the Western world, particularly in Scandinavia, in the late 1970s. The practice finds a cultural parallel in skin whitening in Asian countries, and both support multibillion-dollar industries.Hunt et al. (2012), 7–8. Most indoor tanners are women, 16–25 years old, who want to improve their appearance or mood, acquire a pre-holiday tan, or treat a skin condition.Hay and Lipsky (2012), 181–184.
Once the connection between indoor tanning and skin cancer was confirmed, the number and use of indoor tanning facilities have declined, and many countries have either banned the practice outright or banned it for use by people under the age of 18 years.
About 95% of the UVR that reaches the earth from the sun is UVA and 5% UVB; no appreciable UVC reaches the earth. While tanning systems before the 1970s produced some UVC, modern tanning devices produce no UVC, a small amount of UVB and mostly UVA. Classified by the WHO as a group 1 carcinogen, UV radiation has "complex and mixed effects on human health". While it causes skin cancer and other damage, including skin aging or creases such as Wrinkle, it also triggers the synthesis of vitamin D and in the skin.
Until the 20th century in Europe and the United States, pale skin was a symbol of high social class among white people. Victorian era women would carry and wear wide-brimmed hats and gloves; their homes featured heavy curtains that kept out the sun. But as the moved from country work to city factories, and to crowded, dark, unsanitary homes, pale skin became increasingly associated with poverty and ill health.Hunt et al. (2012), 9–10. In 1923 Coco Chanel returned from a holiday in Cannes with a tan, later telling Vogue magazine: "A golden tan is the index of chic!" Tanned skin had become a fashion accessory.Sophie Wilkinson (19 February 2012). "A short history of tanning", The Guardian.Denise Winterman (1 November 2006). "A tan to die for", BBC News Magazine.
In parallel physicians began advising their patients on the benefits of the "sun cure", citing its antiseptic properties. Sunlight was promoted as a treatment for depression, diabetes, constipation, pneumonia, high and low blood pressure, and many other ailments.Hunt et al. (2012), 13–14. Home-tanning equipment was introduced in the 1920s in the form of "sunlamps" or "health lamps", UV lamps that emitted a large percentage of UVB, leading to burns.Hunt et al. (2012), 14–15. Friedrich Wolff, a German scientist, began using UV light on athletes, and developed beds that emitted 95% UVA and 5% UVB, which reduced the likelihood of burning. The world's first tanning salon opened in 1977 in Berlin, followed by tanning salons in Europe and North America in the late 1970s. In 1978 Wolff's devices began selling in the United States, and the indoor tanning industry was born.Coups and Phillips (2012), 33, 35.
The user sets a timer (or it is set remotely by the salon operator), lies on the bed and pulls down the canopy. The maximum exposure time for most low-pressure beds is 15–20 minutes. In the US, maximum times are set by the manufacturer according to how long it takes to produce four "minimal erythema doses" (MEDs), an upper limit laid down by the FDA.Sharon A. Miller, et al. (2002). "Production and persistence of UV-induced Tan", in Michael F. Holick (ed.). Biologic Effects of Light 2001 (Proceedings of a Symposium, Boston, Massachusetts, 16–18 June 2001). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers (113–126), 114. An MED is the amount of UV radiation that will produce erythema (redness of the skin) within a few hours of exposure.
High-pressure beds use smaller, higher-wattage quartz bulbs and emit a higher percentage of UVA.Lessin et al. (2012), 92. They may emit 10–15 times more UVA than the midday sun, and have a shorter maximum exposure time (typically 10–12 minutes). UVA gives an immediate, short-term tan by bronzing melanin in the skin, but no new melanin is formed. UVB has no immediate bronzing effect, but with a delay of 72 hours makes the skin produce new melanin, leading to tans of longer duration. UVA is less likely to cause burning or dry skin than UVB but is associated with Wrinkle and loss of elasticity because it penetrates deeper.
Commercial tanning beds cost $6,000 to $30,000 , with high-pressure beds at the high end. "No national chain under the sun", Associated Press, 17 March 2006.
The late teens to early–mid 20s is the highest-prevalence age group.Coups and Phillips (2012), 58. In a national survey of white teenagers in 2003 in the US (aged 13–19), 24% had used a tanning facility. Indoor-tanning prevalence figures in the US vary from 30 million each year to just under 10 million (7.8 million women and 1.9 million men).
The figures in the US are in decline: according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, usage in the 18–29 age group fell from 11.3 percent in 2010 to 8.6 percent in 2013, perhaps attributable in part to a 10% "tanning tax" introduced in 2010. Attitudes toward tanning vary across states; in one study, doctors in the Northeast and Midwest of the country were more likely than those in the South or West to recommend tanning beds to treat vitamin D deficiency and depression.Coups and Phillips (2012), 59.
Tanning bed use is more prevalent in northern countries. In Sweden in 2001, 44% said they had used one (in a survey of 1,752 men and women aged 18–37). Their use increased in Denmark between 1994 and 2002 from 35% to 50% (reported use in the previous two years). In Germany, between 29% and 47% had used one, and one survey found that 21% had done so in the previous year. In France, 15% of adults in 1994–1995 had tanned indoors; the practice was more common in the north of France.Hay and Lipsky (2012), 181–182. In 2006, 12% of grade 9–10 students in Canada had used a tanning bed in the last year.Hay and Lipsky (2012), 184. In 2004, 7% of 8–11-year-olds in Scotland said they had used one.Esther Addley (1 August 2009). "How Britain fell in love with the tan", The Guardian. Tanning bed use is higher in the UK in the north of England. One study found that the prevalence was lower in London than in less urban areas of the country.
There are fewer professional salons than tanning facilities; the latter includes tanning beds in gyms, spas and similar. According to the FDA, citing the Indoor Tanning Association, there were 25,000 tanning salons in 2010 in the US (population 308.7 million in 2010).For population: "Population Distribution and Change: 2000 to 2010", United States Census Bureau, March 2011. Mailing-list data suggest there were 18,200 in September 2008 and 12,200 in September 2015, a decline of 30 percent. According to Chris Sternberg of the American Suntanning Association, the figures are 18,000 in 2009 and 9,500 in 2016.Patrick Clark (5 October 2016). "Twilight of the Tanning Salons", Bloomberg.
The South West Public Health Observatory found 5,350 tanning salons in the UK in 2009: 4,492 in England (population 52.6 million in 2010), 484 in Scotland (5.3 million), 203 in Wales (3 million) and 171 in Northern Ireland (1.8 million). "The Public Health etc (Scotland) Act 2008 (Sunbed) Regulations 2009: Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA)" , CMO and Public Health Directorate, Scottish Government, 2009.For population: "Revised Annual Mid-year Population Estimates: 2001 to 2010", Office for National Statistics, 17 December 2013.
Improving appearance is the most-cited reason. Studies show that tanned skin has Semiosis power, signifying health, beauty, youth and the ability to seduce. Women, in particular, say not only that they prefer their appearance with tanned skin, but that they receive the same message from friends and family, especially from other women. They believe tanned skin makes them look thinner and more toned, and that it covers or heals skin blemishes such as acne. Other reasons include acquiring a base tan for further sunbathing; that a uniform tan is easier to achieve in a tanning unit than in the sun; and a desire to avoid Tan line. Proponents of indoor tanning say that tanning beds deliver more consistent, predictable exposure than the sun, but studies show that indoor tanners do suffer burns. In two surveys in the US in 1998 and 2004, 58% of indoor tanners said they had been burned during sessions.Also see
Obtaining vitamin D from indoor tanning has to be weighed against the risk of developing skin cancer. The indoor-tanning industry has stressed the relationship between tanning and the production of vitamin D. According to the US National Institutes of Health, some researchers have suggested that "5–30 minutes of sun exposure between 10 AM and 3 PM at least twice a week to the face, arms, legs, or back without sunscreen usually lead to sufficient vitamin D synthesis and that the moderate use of commercial tanning beds that emit 2%–6% UVB radiation is also effective". "Vitamin D", Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, 11 February 2016. Most researchers say the health risks outweigh the benefits, that the UVB doses produced by tanning beds exceed what is needed for adequate vitamin D production, and that adequate vitamin D levels can be achieved by taking Multivitamin and eating fortified foods.
When UV light therapy is used in combination with psoralen, an oral or topical medication, the combined therapy is referred to as PUVA. A concern with the use of commercial tanning is that beds that primarily emit UVA may not treat psoriasis effectively. One study found that plaque psoriasis is responsive to erythema doses of either UVA or UVB. It does require more energy to reach erythemogenic dosing with UVA.
Non-melanoma skin cancer includes squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and is more common than melanoma. With early detection and treatment, it is typically not life-threatening. Prevalence increases with age, cumulative exposure to UV, and proximity to the equator. It is most prevalent in Australia, where the rate is 1,000 in 100,000 and where, as of 2000, it represented 75 percent of all cancers.Lluria-Prevatt et al. (2013), 321.
Melanoma accounts for approximately one percent of skin cancer, and causes most of skin cancer-related deaths. "Cancer Facts and Figures 2016", American Cancer Society, 2016, 20. The average age of diagnosis is 63, "Key statistics for melanoma skin cancer", American Cancer Society, 20 May 2016. and it is the most common cancer in the 25–29 age group and the second most common in the 15-29 group, which may be due in part to the increased sunlight UV exposure and use of indoor tanning observed in these populations. In the United States, the melanoma incidence rate was 22.3 per 100,000, based on 2010–2014 data from the National Institutes of Health Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program, and the death rate was 2.7 per 100,000. 9,730 people were estimated to die of melanoma in the United States in 2017, and these numbers are anticipated to continue rising. "Vital Signs: Melanoma Incidence and Mortality Trends and Projections — United States, 1982–2030", Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 5 June 2015. Although 91.7% of patients diagnosed with melanoma survive beyond 5 years, advanced melanoma is largely incurable, and only 19.9% percent of patients with metastatic disease survive beyond 5 years.
A meta-analysis of U.S., Europe and Australia data on tanning bed use and skin cancer estimated that annually, 450,000 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer and more than 10,000 cases of melanoma can be attributed to exposure to indoor tanning.
One study conducted among college students found that awareness of the risks of tanning beds did not deter the students from using them. Teenagers are frequent targets of tanning industry marketing, which includes offers of Coupon and placing ads in high-school newspapers.Charlie Pokora (Spring 2010). "Indoor Tanning: Risk to Health vs. Risk to Freedom". The Triple Helix, 21. Members of the United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce commissioned a "sting" operation in 2012, in which callers posing as a 16-year-old girl who wanted to tan for the first time called 300 tanning salons in the US. Staff reportedly failed to follow FDA recommendations, denied the risks of tanning, and offered misleading information about benefits.
In 2010 under the Affordable Care Act, a 10% excise tax was introduced on indoor tanning dubbed a "tanning tax", which is added to the fees charged by tanning facilities; it was expected to raise $2.7 billion for health care over ten years.
Tanning beds are regulated in the United States by the federal government's Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 1040.20). "Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 (Sec. 1040.20)", U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1 April 2016. This is designed to ensure that the devices adhere to a set of safety rules, with the primary focus on sunbed and lamp manufacturers regarding maximum exposure times and product equivalence. Additionally, tanning salons must have a "Recommended Exposure Schedule" posted on both the front of the tanning bed and in the owners' manual, and list the original lamp that was certified for that particular tanning bed. Salon owners are required to replace the lamps with either exactly the same lamp, or a lamp that is certified by the manufacturer.
States control regulations for salons, regarding operator training, sanitization of sunbeds and eyewear, and additional warning signs. Many states also ban or regulate the use of tanning beds by minors under the age of 18.
American osteopathic physician Joseph Mercola was prosecuted in 2016 by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for selling tanning beds to "reverse your wrinkles" and "slash your risk of cancer". Federal Trade Commission v. Mercola, 1:16-cv-04282 (N.D. Ill. 13 April 2016). The settlement meant that consumers who had purchased the devices were eligible for refunds totaling $5.3 million. Mercola had falsely claimed that the FDA "endorsed indoor tanning devices as safe", and had failed to disclose that he had paid the Vitamin D Council for its endorsement of his devices. The FTC said that it was deceptive for the defendants to fail to disclose that tanning is not necessary to produce vitamin D.
Devices
Lamps
Beds
Booths
Eye protection
Prevalence
Tanning-device use
Density of facilities
Reasons
Overview
Vitamin D
Medical use
Risks
Skin cancer
Age and indoor tanning
Young people
Dependency concern
Other risks
Regulation
Australia
Brazil
Canada
European Union
New Zealand
United States
See also
Notes
Bibliography
|
|